Book Review -- Seeing Things As They Are
George Orwell’s work has endured because, as well as challenging injustice and bigotry, he frequently confronted his own contradictions.
Compiled by the renowned academic Peter Davison, Seeing Things As They Are includes extracts from Orwell’s wartime broadcasts for the BBC, arts reviews and his “As I Please” column for the left-wing magazine Tribune as well as an eclectic mix of articles and essays from other journals.
Much of what he writes has a startling resonance today. Of English xenophobia in the years before the war, Orwell noted “a resentment of these foreigners who were supposedly taking Englishmen’s jobs” and that it was “largely Trade Union opposition that prevented a big influx of German Jewish refugees”. In 1946, he wrote a piece for Tribune, entitled “Polish immigrants”, about the outcry “against allowing Poles to work in the two places where labour is most urgently needed – in the mines and on the land”. Orwell derided the “out of date notion that Britain is overpopulated and that more population means more unemployment” and claimed that “British prosperity depends largely on factors outside Britain”. What would Orwell have made of the current debates around immigration and the plight of Syrian refugees?
Orwell wrote damning articles on class and privilege; subjects that remain depressingly familiar. For the July-August 1942 edition of Partisan Review, Orwell remarked “you can only get certain jobs if you have been to one of the right schools, and if you fail and have to be sacked, then somebody else from one of the right schools takes over, and so it continues”. (Orwell went to Eton.) In the same issue he criticised “the widespread evasion of Income Tax … nothing happens because the will to crack down on it is not there while money and political power more or less coincide”.
As well as his political essays, Orwell wrote biting literary criticism. Sometimes the two neatly dovetailed as in his essay for Windmill magazine defending PG Wodehouse against accusations of aiding the Nazi propaganda machine (for a series of broadcasts he gave over the German radio). Orwell claimed that Wodehouse had a "complete lack— so far as one can judge from his printed works – of political awareness".
He viewed the persecution of writers in the USSR in 1947 as an affront against creativity: “You cannot produce a vigorous literature by terrorising everyone into conformity. A writer’s inventive faculties will not work unless he is allowed to say what he feels.” Orwell also displayed a keen sense of humour. Realising that there would be scant opportunity for over-indulgence during the Christmas of 1946 he wished his readers “half a turkey, three tangerines, and a bottle of whisky at not more than double the legal price”.
A shorter version was originally published by the Independent on Sunday
Much of what he writes has a startling resonance today. Of English xenophobia in the years before the war, Orwell noted “a resentment of these foreigners who were supposedly taking Englishmen’s jobs” and that it was “largely Trade Union opposition that prevented a big influx of German Jewish refugees”. In 1946, he wrote a piece for Tribune, entitled “Polish immigrants”, about the outcry “against allowing Poles to work in the two places where labour is most urgently needed – in the mines and on the land”. Orwell derided the “out of date notion that Britain is overpopulated and that more population means more unemployment” and claimed that “British prosperity depends largely on factors outside Britain”. What would Orwell have made of the current debates around immigration and the plight of Syrian refugees?
Orwell wrote damning articles on class and privilege; subjects that remain depressingly familiar. For the July-August 1942 edition of Partisan Review, Orwell remarked “you can only get certain jobs if you have been to one of the right schools, and if you fail and have to be sacked, then somebody else from one of the right schools takes over, and so it continues”. (Orwell went to Eton.) In the same issue he criticised “the widespread evasion of Income Tax … nothing happens because the will to crack down on it is not there while money and political power more or less coincide”.
As well as his political essays, Orwell wrote biting literary criticism. Sometimes the two neatly dovetailed as in his essay for Windmill magazine defending PG Wodehouse against accusations of aiding the Nazi propaganda machine (for a series of broadcasts he gave over the German radio). Orwell claimed that Wodehouse had a "complete lack— so far as one can judge from his printed works – of political awareness".
He viewed the persecution of writers in the USSR in 1947 as an affront against creativity: “You cannot produce a vigorous literature by terrorising everyone into conformity. A writer’s inventive faculties will not work unless he is allowed to say what he feels.” Orwell also displayed a keen sense of humour. Realising that there would be scant opportunity for over-indulgence during the Christmas of 1946 he wished his readers “half a turkey, three tangerines, and a bottle of whisky at not more than double the legal price”.
A shorter version was originally published by the Independent on Sunday
- Get link
- Other Apps